.jpg)
Healthcare Reform Bill Summary
Healthcare Reform Bill – Cost, Coverage, and Deficits! The Healthcare Reform Bill would cost $940 billion over a decade. Healthcare Reform Bill – Medicare, Medicaid, and Insurance Reforms.
Related Video
health reform bill summary | Zada News
health reform bill summary. By Chris, Zada News Monday March 22nd 2010. The House of Representatives passed the sweeping health care bill 219-212, securing a significant victory for President Obama, who lobbied hard this week for the ...
Healthcare Reform Bill Summary
The twenty-second of March marked an enormous day for the government of America and the people as well, you could say that it is the first time that the term.
Health Care Reform Bill Summary and Highlights : World Correspondents
Obama is campaigning to gather votes for his Health Care Reform Bill. This bill is said to be the largest proposed Health Care Bill since the introduction and.
Health Care Reform Bill Summary | US Post Today.
Tags: Affordability, Caption, Consumer Price Index, Federal Poverty Level, Health Care Bill, health care bill summary, health care reform bill, health care reform bill summary, health care reform vote, Health-Care Reform, premiums, Sec, ...
healthcare reform bill summary | TrendyTwits
Obama Healthcare Reform Bill Vote Count – Total Results, Details and Summary ...What America Is Searching (blog)Many Americans are searching to find the.
New health care bill summary | Just the basics
The new health care bill has passed the House, but at over 2000 pages, it's a long read. What are the basics of this legislation? READ MORE...
Whats the Health Care Reform Bill Summary like? | Linda Hua Answers
WHATS THE HEALTH CARE REFORM BILL SUMMARY LIKE? Cost: * $940 billion over 10 years. Deficit: *. Would revoke the necessity by $143 billion over the initial 10 years. That is an updated CBO estimate. Their initial rough guess pronounced ...
Watch Live News Coverage on Health Care Reform Bill Summary – CNN ...
With the health care reform bill summary being a very hot topic today it is very likely that many Americans will search to watch live news coverage on this...
Can anyone verify this information about the healthcare reform bill?
Read the following link. This man read all of it and did a basic summary of this bill. http://blog.flecksoflife.com/2009/07/19/the-hc-monstrosity/It only takes around ten minutes to go through it.Brutus, why shouldn't I cite this blog as my reference? After all, have you read all 1000 plus pages of this bill?And I don't care how many versions there are, it will still have many of the provisions shown in the link. The only things they change are the things that will make the American people think they are getting health coverage for free. They have also said that subsidies for the poorer class won't take effect until after the next election. Have you ever asked yourself why? Why not help people now? Why do the poor people have to wait until 2012?
What do you think about the health care reform bill?
i have soo much hw and i need help so i can finish some of it. thankyou. Key Senate Committee Passes Sweeping US Health Care Reform Bill The powerful Senate Finance Committee has passed its health care reform bill, clearing the first major hurdle for President Barack Obama's goal of overhauling the U.S. health care system and extending insurance coverage to many more Americans. All 13 Democrats on the panel and only one Republican voted for the bill, in what may be a sign of a fierce political battle to come. A Senate clerk and a beaming Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus announced the result of the vote after months of wrangling in the panel on the controversial issue of health care reform. During a final, long day of debate in the panel Tuesday, Baucus pushed hard for his bill, saying it is moderate enough to win the 60 votes needed to pass in the full Senate. "Now is the time to get this done. Let us enact this balanced, common-sense plan to improve health care. Let us reform the health care system to control costs and premiums, let us extend health care coverage to all Americans," he said. The ranking Republican member of the panel, Senator Chuck Grassley, disagreed, saying Republicans also want reform, but that the bill is too costly and too intrusive into Americans' lives. "It will be clear that this bill is already moving on a slippery slope to more and more government control of health care," he said. Some Democrats on the panel would have liked to have had a more extensive bill that would have extended coverage to more Americans, and that would have included a so-called public option, a government-run alternative to private health care insurance. One of them was Democratic Senator John Rockefeller "Universal coverage has always been the goal of health reform, and leaving 16 million men and women and children uninsured is wrong to me, as the senator from West Virginia," he said. Rockefeller and other liberal Democrats on the committee overcame their objections and decided to support voting the bill out of the committee, so that health care reform legislation can move forward. They were joined by one lone Republican, Senator Olympia Snow of Maine. "So is this bill all that I would want? Far from it. Is it all that it can be? No. But when history calls, history calls. And I happen to think that the consequences of inaction dictate the urgency of Congress to take every opportunity to demonstrate its capacity to solve the monumental issues of our time," she said. Snowe's support was crucial to Democrats as the process moves forward, allowing them to claim bipartisan support for the president's reform goals. Snowe's courageous vote gained her a special thank you from President Obama, who was meeting with Spanish Prime Minister Jose Zapatero at the White House. "I just want to thank the Senate Finance Committee for ploughing forward on what we all acknowledge is an extraordinarily complicated issue. I think they have done excellent work, and I thank not only Chairman Baucus and others, but in particular, Senator Snowe has been extraordinarily diligent in working together," he said. The other 9 Republicans on the panel continued their staunch opposition to the bill. Republican Senator John Cornyn of Texas had this reaction to any claims of bipartisan support for health care reform. "Instead of bipartisanship we see a my way or the highway approach, which unfortunately is going to jeopardize the health care coverage people have now, make matters worse, not better," he said. The so-called Baucus bill would require nearly all Americans to purchase health care insurance or face a penalty. It would also subject insurance companies to tough new regulations, such as no longer being able to reject individuals for coverage because of pre-existing conditions. After Tuesday's preliminary victory for Democrats, the battle continues in Congress. The Baucus bill now has to be merged with a bill that has already been passed by the Senate Health Committee, before it can move to the Senate floor for debate. If it passes in the Senate, health care legislation would also have to pass in the House of Representatives, where Democrats hold a larger majority and many want a generous bill that will extend coverage to as many Americans as possible and include a government-run alternative to private insurance.
can someone please help me to write a summary on this news http://www.voanews.com/english/2009-10-13-voa56.cfm?
I mean Obama made a deal with BIG PHARMA to protect high drug prices and subsequently BIG PHARMA's profits. In return BIG PHARMA doesn't publicly oppose anything and even provides $150 million for pro Obamacare ads. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090917/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_health_care_overhaul;_ylt=As1Fs8xme5LxwCekfpaq25hv24cA;_ylu=X3oDMTJxdjA0a3R0BGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMDkwOTE3L3VzX2hlYWx0aF9jYXJlX292ZXJoYXVsBGNwb3MDMQRwb3MDMQRzZWMDeW5fdG9wX3N0b3JpZXMEc2xrA29iYW1hcGl0Y2hlcw-- Obama, seemingly energized by the wildly cheering students at the University of Maryland, said forces are lining up in favor of a major health care bill, even as "special interests" oppose it. He said an "unprecedented coalition" of hospitals, doctors, nurses and drugmakers support the effort. Some of the most enthusiastic backers, he said, "are the very medical professionals who have firsthand knowledge" of how badly the current system operates. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhYzOni6tbw&feature=player_embedded Air America segment in which Obama is labeled "a charming liar" for selling out to BIG PHARMA by making backroom deals with lobbyists. (Which broke MULTIPLE campaign promises......lobbyists, transparency, corruption etc.) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/13/internal-memo-confirms-bi_n_258285.html A memo obtained by the Huffington Post confirms that the White House and the pharmaceutical lobby secretly agreed to precisely the sort of wide-ranging deal that both parties have been denying over the past week. The memo, which according to a knowledgeable health care lobbyist was prepared by a person directly involved in the negotiations, lists exactly what the White House gave up, and what it got in return. http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/08/19/the-baucus-caucus-phrma-insurance-hospitals-and-rahm/ " Sources familiar with the lobbyist meeting described it as collegial, but they said Baucus' aides made clear that any public opposition to the proposed financing of a reform package would be at their clients' peril. The staffers' message to K Street was clear: Tell your clients to let the process work and don't torpedo it with advertisements, press releases and Web sites. The goal of keeping stakeholders at the table was threefold: 1. Keep them from advertising against the White House plan 2. Keep them from torpedoing vulnerable Democrats in 2010 so there isn't a repeat of 1994 3. Keep their money out of GOP coffers You can see the fingerprints in the deals that they made: the $150 million PhRMA was spending on ads for health care reform, the $2.5 million they spent helping vulnerable freshmen, and the total fury that Boehner has unleashed on PhRMA and other stakeholders for making deals with the White House. People make a mistake when they think the battle for health care reform is about ideology, because it's not. It's about who controls K Street and the cash that flows from it, which could fund a 2010 GOP resurgenece -- or not. -------------------------------------------------------------- Dems in Congress received as much lobbying money from the insurance industry as anyone. Which explains why there is a mandate to buy insurance but no competition for the insurance industry. http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/summary.php?ind=F09&cycle=All&recipdetail=M&sortorder=U McCain, John (R-AZ) $2,894,353 Obama, Barack (D) $2,464,377 Dodd, Chris (D-CT) $2,261,546 Clinton, Hillary (D-NY) $1,886,165 Pomeroy, Earl (D-ND) $1,835,306 Johnson, Nancy L (R-CT) $1,612,499 Rangel, Charles B (D-NY) $1,417,435 Kerry, John (D-MA) $1,396,617 Santorum, Rick (R-PA) $1,267,850 Nelson, Ben (D-NE) $1,245,299 Baucus, Max (D-MT) $1,196,463 Schumer, Charles E (D-NY) $1,096,200 Specter, Arlen (D-PA) $1,056,655 Lieberman, Joe (I-CT) $1,033,402 Grassley, Chuck (R-IA) $948,024 McConnell, Mitch (R-KY) $943,507 Neal, Richard E (D-MA) $943,281 DeWine, Mike (R-OH) $923,163 Boehner, John (R-OH) $917,806 Gephardt, Richard A (D) $884,073 As the "reform" currently stands: 1)There would be no public option (no competition for insurance companies) 2)There will be a mandate to buy insurance or face a tax penalty (50 million new customers for the insurance industry) 3)Obama's BIG PHARMA deal means that importing cheaper prescription drugs from Canada is completely out of the question (50 million new insured will need drugs too:) What the hell is this accomplishing?? (Other than creating huge profits for BIG PHARMA and the insurance industry)??tribeca......"The insurance industry is violently opposed to the public option, for obvious reasons." And what OBVIOUS reasons would those be?? THERE IS GOING TO BE A MANDATE TO BUY INSURANCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Aren't Democrats the ones who claimed "special interests" (insurance/BIG PHARMA) were opposed to their 'reform?
I mean Obama made a deal with BIG PHARMA to protect high drug prices and subsequently BIG PHARMA's profits. In return BIG PHARMA doesn't publicly oppose anything and even provides $150 million for pro Obamacare ads. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhYzOni6tbw&feature=player_embedded Air America segment in which Obama is labeled "a charming liar" for selling out to BIG PHARMA by making backroom deals with lobbyists. (Which broke MULTIPLE campaign promises......lobbyists, transparency, corruption etc.) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/13/internal-memo-confirms-bi_n_258285.html A memo obtained by the Huffington Post confirms that the White House and the pharmaceutical lobby secretly agreed to precisely the sort of wide-ranging deal that both parties have been denying over the past week. The memo, which according to a knowledgeable health care lobbyist was prepared by a person directly involved in the negotiations, lists exactly what the White House gave up, and what it got in return. http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/08/19/the-baucus-caucus-phrma-insurance-hospitals-and-rahm/ " Sources familiar with the lobbyist meeting described it as collegial, but they said Baucus' aides made clear that any public opposition to the proposed financing of a reform package would be at their clients' peril. The staffers' message to K Street was clear: Tell your clients to let the process work and don't torpedo it with advertisements, press releases and Web sites. The goal of keeping stakeholders at the table was threefold: 1. Keep them from advertising against the White House plan 2. Keep them from torpedoing vulnerable Democrats in 2010 so there isn't a repeat of 1994 3. Keep their money out of GOP coffers You can see the fingerprints in the deals that they made: the $150 million PhRMA was spending on ads for health care reform, the $2.5 million they spent helping vulnerable freshmen, and the total fury that Boehner has unleashed on PhRMA and other stakeholders for making deals with the White House. People make a mistake when they think the battle for health care reform is about ideology, because it's not. It's about who controls K Street and the cash that flows from it, which could fund a 2010 GOP resurgenece -- or not. -------------------------------------------- Dems in Congress received as much lobbying money from the insurance industry as anyone. Which explains why there is a mandate to buy insurance but no competition for the insurance industry. http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/summary.php?ind=F09&cycle=All&recipdetail=M&sortorder=U McCain, John (R-AZ) $2,894,353 Obama, Barack (D) $2,464,377 Dodd, Chris (D-CT) $2,261,546 Clinton, Hillary (D-NY) $1,886,165 Pomeroy, Earl (D-ND) $1,835,306 Johnson, Nancy L (R-CT) $1,612,499 Rangel, Charles B (D-NY) $1,417,435 Kerry, John (D-MA) $1,396,617 Santorum, Rick (R-PA) $1,267,850 Nelson, Ben (D-NE) $1,245,299 Baucus, Max (D-MT) $1,196,463 Schumer, Charles E (D-NY) $1,096,200 Specter, Arlen (D-PA) $1,056,655 Lieberman, Joe (I-CT) $1,033,402 Grassley, Chuck (R-IA) $948,024 McConnell, Mitch (R-KY) $943,507 Neal, Richard E (D-MA) $943,281 DeWine, Mike (R-OH) $923,163 Boehner, John (R-OH) $917,806 Gephardt, Richard A (D) $884,073 As the "reform" currently stands: 1)There would be no public option (no competition for insurance companies) 2)There will be a mandate to buy insurance or face a tax penalty (50 million new customers for the insurance industry) 3)Obama's BIG PHARMA deal means that importing cheaper prescription drugs from Canada is completely out of the question (50 million new insured will need drugs too:) What the hell is this accomplishing?? (Other than creating huge profits for BIG PHARMA and the insurance industry)??
Isn't it a bad sign for a "reform" bill when all the major industry players are in support of it?
"Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) said Wednesday that he will push ahead with a comprehensive health care reform bill with — or without — Republican support and start a committee markup the week of Sept. 21." http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/26912 Here is a brief summary of what the Baucus health care reform bill contains: "Fines proposed for going without health insurance" The Baucus plan would require insurers to take all applicants, regardless of age or health. But smokers could be charged higher premiums. And 60-year-olds could be charged five times as much for a policy as 20-year-olds. Some experts consider the $900-billion price tag a relative bargain because the country now spends about $2.5 trillion a year on health care. But it would require hefty fees on insurers, drug companies and others in the health care industry to help pay for it. Just as auto coverage is now mandatory in nearly all states, Baucus would require that all Americans get health insurance once the system is overhauled. Penalties for failing to do so would start at $750 a year for individuals and $1,500 for families. Households making more than three times the federal poverty level — about $66,000 for a family of four — would face the maximum fines. For families, it would be $3,800, and for individuals, $950. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090908/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_health_care_overhaul
What's your opinion on the Baucus health care reform bill?
Let's look at the MOST recent budget outcome - the Bush budget of 2008. http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/100xx/doc10014/March2009_HistoricalTables.pdf So take a look at that. Obama and congress have added more than a TRILLION in spending to the Bush budget of 2009 - leaving us with a MASSIVE deficit of $1.86 Trillion... Something the Bush budget would never have given us... (I had to point that out, several idiots point to Obama's own deficit as Bush's fault. I hope you people know Obama and congress CAN add spending to the current budget...) ***Let's get to the point here...*** So first let's start off with the fact that 45 million Americans out of 300 million are not insured by any company. That's 15% of the population that's goes without insurance. So let's get this straight. We're getting ready to pay for a $630 Billion dollar health care reform bill, just to cover 15% of the population. $630 Billion per year is more than what we spend per year on our Military/Defense Budget. Even if we cut Military/Defense spending by 50%, we won't be able to afford this. This cost doesn't even cover the fact, that like Medicare and Social Security, this cost will increase each year to cover a growing population. Like Medicare and Social Security, this will continue to grow in cost FOREVER unless the program ends. Not to mention the fact that we're already in massive debt, 47% of our debt is in China's hands, and that Obama is giving our nation a $1.86 TRILLION dollar DEFICIT (according to the CBO). Is this really sustainable? Source: Just do some research at the damn CBO... SUMMARY: Cost PER YEAR of Public Option = $630 Billion (lowest estimate) Obama Deficit = $1.86 TRILLION (Bush deficit of 2008 is $454.8 Billion.) 47% of our debt = Under China's hands Military/Defense Spending = $612.4 Billion PER YEAR. HOW CAN WE AFFORD OBAMA CARE IF WE CAN'T EVEN AFFORD WHAT WE'RE DOING NOW?PS: don't give me benefits of the Public Plan -- what's the point if you can't afford it?FILE works fine... update your damn Acrobat reader...POTATO.... No there is no flaw... We can't afford it and the regulations that keep the companies within state borders are the VERY reason for little competition and high prices... NEXT...
How can we afford Obama's Public Option?
Illegal aliens will be covered under the proposed health care reform bill? Read what the CRS has concluded. Looks like you and I will support millions more. Congressional Research Agency Confirms Illegal Aliens Will Get Health Benefits Under House Bill Last Tuesday, the Congressional Research Service (CRS), which is the non-partisan "research arm" of the United States Congress, issued a report that concludes that illegal aliens will be able to receive benefits under the House health care bill (H.R. 3200) through two major loopholes. (See CRS Report and FAIR Press Release, August 26, 2009). According to its own website, CRS is a legislative branch agency that provides Congress with "policy and legal analysis" that is authoritative, objective and accurate. (CRS website). The latest CRS report validates what FAIR has been saying for the past month and a half — that illegal aliens will be able to receive taxpayer-funded health benefits under the House health care bill. (See FAIR's Legislative Updates, July 20, 2009; July 27, 2009 and August 3, 2009). The House bill creates an "exchange" and "all individuals," which would include illegal aliens, are eligible to participate in the exchange. Anyone who participates in the exchange, and does not otherwise have health insurance, can either enroll in the public option plan created by the House bill or enroll in a private insurance plan. Accordingly, the first loophole that provides illegal aliens with health insurance is the ability for illegal aliens to freely enroll in the taxpayer-subsidized public option. According to CRS, "H.R. 3200 does not contain any restrictions on non-citizens — whether legally or illegally present, or in the United States temporarily or permanently — from participating in the Exchange." (CRS Report). Accordingly, illegal aliens can enroll in the public option, courtesy of the American taxpayers, to meet their health insurance needs. (See CNN.com, August 2009). The second major loophole is the failure to require any meaningful verification procedure for taxpayer-subsidized insurance credits. Under the House bill, individuals who buy private insurance through the Exchange may receive an affordability credit to offset the cost of insurance. This credit is ostensibly limited to individuals lawfully present in the U.S., but CRS (like FAIR) notes the complete absence of any provision in the House bill that requires verification of eligibility for the affordability credits. Without such a mechanism, there is nothing in the bill that will prevent illegal aliens from receiving this taxpayer subsidy to buy private health insurance. These conclusions by CRS should eliminate any remaining doubt about whether illegal aliens will receive health benefits under the bill. As a result of this report, President Obama can no longer characterize the concerns about the illegal alien health care loophole under the bill as "misinformation." (See FAIR's Legislative Update, August 24, 2009 and FAIR's Health Care Podcast, August 24, 2009). In addition, Members of Congress can no longer claim the bill prevents coverage for illegal aliens, and the media can no longer suggest this concern is a "myth." (See FAIR's House bill summary and Townhall.com, August 27, 2009).
Anyone NOW have any doubts that?
There is much confusion regarding what we may have in the way of health care reform. The number of bills, proposals and amendments show this. In addition is there one site which has objective summaries and comparisons of the proposal provisions?
What is the number of Health care Reform bills and amendments there to in each house of Congress?
This is the House Democrats' big health care reform bill. Broadly, it seeks to expand health care coverage to the approximately 40 million Americans who are currently uninsured by lowering the cost of health care and making the system more efficient. To that end, it includes a new government-run insurance plan to compete with the private companies, a requirement that all Americans have health insurance, a prohibition on denying coverage because of pre-existing conditions and, to pay for it all, a surtax on households with an income above $350,000. A more detailed summary of the bill by the House Committee on Education and Labor can be read here.
Does this sound good to u? If yes why. If not why.?
Here's a picture of the bus, posted by Americans for Prosperity, one of the groups running the tour!: http://www.flickr.com/photos/7888795@N07/3773445254/ I'm not saying that the protesters themselves are paid or motivated by anything other than anger due to the false information they're being fed, but the bus tours are very real and funded by health care industry lobbyists and others who stand to gain from the status quo. Here's an article on their website about the bus tour: http://www.americansforprosperity.org/072809-“hands-my-health-care”-bus-tour-virginia-bringing-big-crowds And then there's the other organizations, like Right Principals. Here's their original memo explaining how to organize these protests: http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/documents/2009/08/memo-details-co-ordinated-anti-reform-harrassment-strategy.php?page=1 Dick Armey, Chairman of FreedomWorks, a similar group running many of these protests http://www.freedomworks.org/about/chairman-dick-armey Dick Armey, lobbyist at DLA Piper: http://www.opensecrets.org/revolving/rev_summary.php?id=25664 DLA client list, including Metropolitan Health Networks, AIG, American Council of Life Insurers, SleepMed Inc and other companies that are profiting from the status quo: http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/firmsum.php?lname=DLA+Piper&year= There's others, like Conservatives for Patient's Rights, run by Rick Scott who makes a fortune off the status quo and uses his organization to launch false advertisements about the bill. My point is, it's not like these things are hidden, they're right out in the open. Why do people think that this is some kind of weird conspiracy theory. _______________ If you have genuine problems with the health care bill, you should be angry at the people who are shutting down the debates that give you a forum to make your points in a way they will be heard. The status quo is a terrible option. If you don't like the new bill, go to the town hall meetings and PARTICIPATE, don't shut them down. (Sorry, the last part was a rant, but the rest is a legit question, why when it is so out in the open do people not believe it?)Ricardo, I was against that too. I didn't post a question on Yahoo Answers because I didn't have the time (I rarely post questions, this is only my 20th), but privately, I thought it was a bad idea. It's a bit, since they were protesting when they weren't given the opportunity for debate, but some of the protests were completely out of line, even protesting people who gave the money back. And any time your giving out home addresses to an angry mob, you're asking for trouble. That aspect was worse. The protests should have been held at company headquarters. If you were going to do it at people's homes (which I think is terrible), go with the board of directors, not everyone getting bonuses. So we agree about the irresponsibility of those protests. Do we also agree about these?Little Clev, that's a fair beef with the bill. If I were you I'd contact your representative about it. It's the kind of thing that's changeable in negotiation too. But to say that the protests aren't shutting down the town halls is incorrect. In a number of them, the officials have had to be escorted off by police and the Right Principles memo advocates disruption in a variety of ways that are counterproductive to getting legitimate concerns like yours heard.I also don't mean to imply that I'm against organized protests. My only point was that these ARE organized protests, which many people seem to deny. These particular protests happen to be counterproductive to real debate and so I oppose them, but I have no problem with organizing protests in general.Jason, the question was regarding why many people think these are spontaneous. You seem to accept that they are not, hence the question was not directed at you. I have no problem with organized protests or with people having a problem with the bill. I do have some issues with protests designed to end, rather than spark, debate, but that wasn't really my question.
